Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was revealed 3 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the SP-800 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The full galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Astro Zoom AZ651 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
SP-800 UZ | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
Astro Zoom AZ651 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 compared to the SP-800 UZ.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and SP-800 UZ is 65 and 69 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to render greater detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 12s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | - | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $419 | $270 |