Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3
65 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
91 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic ZS3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and ZS3 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured 4 years later than the ZS3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores vs the ZS3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Panasonic ZS3
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | May 2009 | Fresher by 57 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| ZS3 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic ZS3
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has outside dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS3 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic ZS3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the ZS3.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and ZS3 is 65 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and ZS3.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
| Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lbs) | 229 gr (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $419 | $200 |