Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
89 Imaging
64 Features
62 Overall
63
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Launched May 2014
- Superseded the Samsung NX2000
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung NX3000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 4 months before the NX3000 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the NX3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung NX3000. The full galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung NX3000
Astro Zoom AZ651 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
NX3000 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung NX3000
Astro Zoom AZ651 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | May 2014 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides external measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung NX3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the NX3000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and NX3000 is 65 and 89 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and NX3000.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will produce greater detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung NX3000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2014-05-26 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | B740 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $419 | $897 |