Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210

Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Samsung WB210 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
45
Overall
40

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 Overview

Here is a in depth assessment of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was revealed 2 years later than the WB210 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up against the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung WB210

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WB210 
LaunchedJanuary 2014July 2011Fresher by 31 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k1kCrisper screen (+919k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 WB210 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Screen dimension3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB210

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WB210 
Manually focus More accurate focus

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys outside dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung WB210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the WB210.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB210 is 65 and 94 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB210.

As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to resolve more detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Astro Zoom AZ651 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Portrait photography with Samsung WB210
53
manual focus
decent MP (21 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
39
has manual focus
good MP (14MP)
includes face detect focusing
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB210 Street photography highlights
59
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
66
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch to focus
lighter than others (174 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Sports photography camera
51
excellent zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (21 megapixels)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography features
Samsung WB210 Travel photography features
60
decent MP (21MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
really wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (567g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
71
lighter than others (174 grams)
offers touch to focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography advice
54
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (21 megapixels)
supports RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse mode
46
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging information
Samsung WB210 Vlogging information
60
really wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
33
fairly wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than others (174 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB210
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Samsung WB210
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Samsung WB210
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-01-07 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focus distance 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3.5"
Display resolution 920k dots 1k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed - 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 9.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 567 gr (1.25 lbs) 174 gr (0.38 lbs)
Dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type - microSC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $419 $279