Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300

Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Released January 2014
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Released February 2013
  • Previous Model is Sony HX200V
  • Later Model is Sony HX400V
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 Overview

The following is a thorough overview of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 11 months after the HX300 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the HX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Sony HX300

 Astro Zoom AZ651 HX300 
ReleasedJanuary 2014February 2013Newer by 11 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 HX300 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Screen resolution921k920kCrisper screen (+1k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sony HX300

 Astro Zoom AZ651 HX300 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the HX300.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and HX300 is 65 and 63 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and HX300.

Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to show extra detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Portrait photography camera
53
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (21 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
saves RAW files
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
42
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Street photography with Sony HX300
59
screen articulates
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (567 grams)
50
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than average in class (623 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Sports photography with Sony HX300
51
great zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (21 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography features
Sony HX300 Travel photography features
60
decent sensor resolution (21 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (1560mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (567g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
54
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (623g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography highlights
Sony HX300 Landscape photography highlights
54
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (21MP)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
48
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging info
Sony HX300 Vlogging info
60
really wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
missing external mic support
heavier than average in class (567g)
25
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
more heavy than average in class (623g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sony HX300
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-01-07 2013-02-20
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed - 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 9.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 gr (1.25 lbs) 623 gr (1.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Time lapse feature
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $419 $339