Kodak S-1 vs Leica T Type 701

Below, we are reviewing the Kodak S-1 vs Leica T Type 701, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Kodak and Leica. The image resolution of the S-1 (16MP) and the T Type 701 (16MP) is fairly close but the S-1 (Four Thirds) and T Type 701 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The S-1 was brought out 3 months later than the T Type 701 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S-1 matches up vs the T Type 701 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Pixpro S-1 & Leica T Typ 701. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak S-1 Gallery & Leica T Type 701 Gallery.

When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak S-1 features external dimensions of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Leica T Type 701 has proportions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak S-1 vs Leica T Type 701 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the S-1 compared to the T Type 701.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S-1 and T Type 701 is 88 and 85 respectively.

Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S-1 and T Type 701.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The S-1 uses the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field tougher.