Clicky

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
61
Overall
56
Kodak Pixpro S-1 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Kodak S-1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
  • Launched June 2014
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Announced April 2010
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

The following is a in depth overview of the Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the S-1 (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (Four Thirds).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The S-1 was revealed 4 years after the E-P2 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the S-1 grades versus the E-P2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Olympus E-P2

 S-1 E-P2 
AnnouncedJune 2014April 2010Newer by 51 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Kodak S-1

 E-P2 S-1 

Common features in the Kodak S-1 and Olympus E-P2

 S-1 E-P2 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak S-1 provides physical dimensions of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Examine the Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the S-1 compared to the E-P2.

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S-1 and E-P2 is 88 and 86 respectively.

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S-1 and E-P2.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Kodak S-1 to give greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger S-1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak S-1 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography details
71
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Kodak S-1 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
85
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak S-1 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography advice
62
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (410 shots)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
does not have phase detect AF
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery (300 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak S-1
Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
65
better than average battery power (410 shots)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
43
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery (300 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak S-1 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography advice
74
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (410 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
60
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery (300 CIPA)
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak S-1
Vlogging with Olympus E-P2
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak S-1 and Olympus E-P2
 Kodak Pixpro S-1Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak Pixpro S-1 Olympus PEN E-P2
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2014-06-24 2010-04-22
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4640 x 3480 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 25 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 290g (0.64 pounds) 355g (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 56
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 505
Other
Battery life 410 photos 300 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LB-070 BLS-1
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $250 $799