Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F
85 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 113 x 67 x 46mm
- Launched June 2018
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Leica C-Lux and Samsung WB800F, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Leica and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the C-Lux (20MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the C-Lux (1") and WB800F (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe C-Lux was released 5 years after the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Leica C-Lux being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the C-Lux scores against the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica C-Lux & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are provided at Leica C-Lux Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C-Lux over the Samsung WB800F
C-Lux | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2018 | January 2013 | More modern by 66 months | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 460k | Clearer display (+780k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Leica C-Lux
WB800F | C-Lux |
---|
Common features in the Leica C-Lux and Samsung WB800F
C-Lux | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Leica C-Lux has got exterior measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Leica C-Lux and Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the C-Lux and the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C-Lux and WB800F is 85 and 92 respectively.
Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the C-Lux and WB800F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The C-Lux featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica C-Lux will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern C-Lux is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica C-Lux vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Leica C-Lux | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Samsung |
Model | Leica C-Lux | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-06-10 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,240 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 340 grams (0.75 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,050 | $300 |