Leica C vs Olympus VG-160
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Revealed September 2013
- Additionally Known as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Leica C vs Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the C (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly similar but the C (1/1.7") and VG-160 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe C was introduced 21 months later than the VG-160 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the C grades against the VG-160 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica C and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are available at Leica C Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus VG-160
| C | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 21 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Leica C
| VG-160 | C |
|---|
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus VG-160
| C | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Leica C features outside measurements of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the C against the VG-160.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C and VG-160 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the C and VG-160.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The C having a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus VG-160 will deliver more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer C is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Leica C vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Leica C | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica C | Olympus VG-160 |
| Also called as | Typ112 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-09-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 165 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $1,299 | $90 |