Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08139/081398bcc0c8f94f2393a10fc9ce1710425f2ed3" alt="Olympus E-450 front Olympus E-450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released March 2009
- Superseded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-450 was revealed 9 months prior to the Tough-3000 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-450 grades versus the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-450 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-450 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-450
Tough-3000 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 9 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-450 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-450 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-450 compared to the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e17d/7e17de4aebaf83b65e32528824cc48dfb7076d6c" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and Tough-3000 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5727/b572769d8a91d863c6392354faf93b9e6af658f2" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-450 and Tough-3000.
Clearly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-450 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-450 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaf14/aaf14912ded0ee6e8190243f3f3c76e91e1b2e7f" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa659/aa659bca7de77671b2c21ce1b05d9eb2a961ff64" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-450 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-03-31 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $138 | $0 |