Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Launched September 2013
- Alternate Name is Typ112
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the C (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/1.7").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C was launched 9 months after the XZ-2 iHS so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the C matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica C & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Leica C Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
C | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2013 | December 2012 | More modern by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Leica C
XZ-2 iHS | C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
C | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica C enjoys outside measurements of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the C vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the C and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of files though you should factor the age of the products into consideration. The more modern C will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Leica C | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica C | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Also called | Typ112 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-09-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | 340 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $1,299 | $450 |