Leica C vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
36 Features
59 Overall
45
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Leica C vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Launched September 2013
- Alternate Name is Typ112
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica C vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Leica C versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Leica and Samsung. The resolution of the C (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the C (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe C was announced 4 years after the SL202 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the C scores versus the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Leica C vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica C & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica C Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Samsung SL202
| C | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 56 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Leica C
| SL202 | C |
|---|
Common features in the Leica C and Samsung SL202
| C | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Leica C vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Leica C provides outer dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Leica C versus Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the C compared to the SL202.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Leica C vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the C and SL202.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The C with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Leica C will provide extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger C provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica C vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica C vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Leica C | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica C | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | Typ112 | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-09-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $1,299 | $140 |