Leica C vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Launched September 2013
- Additionally referred to as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Leica C vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Leica and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the C (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the C (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C was introduced 9 months after the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the C grades versus the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica C & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica C Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Samsung WB800F
| C | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2013 | January 2013 | Newer by 9 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Leica C
| WB800F | C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica C and Samsung WB800F
| C | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Leica C comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Leica C vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the C against the WB800F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the C and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the C and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The C with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will render more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher C is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Leica C | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica C | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called as | Typ112 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-09-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $1,299 | $300 |