Leica C vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Launched September 2013
- Additionally referred to as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Leica C vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Leica and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the C (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the C (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe C was introduced 9 months after the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the C grades versus the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica C & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica C Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Samsung WB800F
| C | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2013 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 9 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Leica C
| WB800F | C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica C and Samsung WB800F
| C | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Leica C comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Leica C vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the C against the WB800F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the C and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the C and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The C with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will render more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher C is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Leica C vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Leica C | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica C | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called as | Typ112 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-09-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $1,299 | $300 |