Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Launched September 2010
- Newer Model is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Leica D-LUX 5 versus Olympus SH-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the D-LUX 5 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") and SH-3 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe D-LUX 5 was introduced 6 years before the SH-3 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the D-LUX 5 scores versus the SH-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica D-LUX 5 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Olympus SH-3
D-LUX 5 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Leica D-LUX 5
SH-3 | D-LUX 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | September 2010 | Fresher by 65 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica D-LUX 5 and Olympus SH-3
D-LUX 5 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Leica D-LUX 5 has physical dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Leica D-LUX 5 versus Olympus SH-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the D-LUX 5 compared to the SH-3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the D-LUX 5 and SH-3 is 88 and 88 respectively.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The photograph below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the D-LUX 5 and SH-3.
To sum up, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The D-LUX 5 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SH-3 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older D-LUX 5 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Leica D-LUX 5 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica D-LUX 5 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-09-21 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $579 |