Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Released September 2010
- Successor is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Leica and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the D-LUX 5 (10MP) and WG-20 (14MP) and the D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") and WG-20 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe D-LUX 5 was introduced 4 years before the WG-20 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the D-LUX 5 grades versus the WG-20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica D-LUX 5 & Ricoh WG-20. The whole galleries are provided at Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Ricoh WG-20
D-LUX 5 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Leica D-LUX 5
WG-20 | D-LUX 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 41 months |
Common features in the Leica D-LUX 5 and Ricoh WG-20
D-LUX 5 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Leica D-LUX 5 has got physical dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-20 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the D-LUX 5 compared to the WG-20.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the D-LUX 5 and WG-20 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the D-LUX 5 and WG-20.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The D-LUX 5 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-20 will provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged D-LUX 5 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
Leica D-LUX 5 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica D-LUX 5 | Ricoh WG-20 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-09-21 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 164 grams (0.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $799 | $370 |