Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210
88 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
45 Overall
39
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Launched September 2010
- Later Model is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Photography Glossary Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Leica D-LUX 5 versus Samsung WB210, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Leica and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the D-LUX 5 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) and the D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") and WB210 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe D-LUX 5 was launched 10 months earlier than the WB210 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the D-LUX 5 matches up vs the WB210 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica D-LUX 5 & Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are available at Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Samsung WB210
| D-LUX 5 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k | 1k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Leica D-LUX 5
| WB210 | D-LUX 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | September 2010 | Fresher by 10 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica D-LUX 5 and Samsung WB210
| D-LUX 5 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Leica D-LUX 5 offers outer measurements of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica D-LUX 5 versus Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the D-LUX 5 vs the WB210.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D-LUX 5 and WB210 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the D-LUX 5 and WB210.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The D-LUX 5 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB210 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older D-LUX 5 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Leica D-LUX 5 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica D-LUX 5 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 174 gr (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $799 | $279 |