Leica D-Lux 7 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
81 Imaging
57 Features
75 Overall
64
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Leica D-Lux 7 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 17MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 403g - 118 x 66 x 64mm
- Revealed November 2018
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month A Tale of Two Large Sensor Compacts: Leica D-Lux 7 vs. Sigma DP2 Merrill
When diving into the realm of large sensor compact cameras, enthusiasts and professionals alike expect a high degree of image quality merged with portability - a camera that delivers serious results without the bulk of a DSLR or mirrorless system. Among these contenders, two well-known names stand out: the 2018 Leica D-Lux 7 and the 2012 Sigma DP2 Merrill. Despite sharing a category, these cameras reflect very different philosophies and technological epochs. I've put both through extensive hands-on evaluations, comparing them across various technical and practical lenses to help you make an informed choice based on your photographic passions.

Putting Sizes and Handling Under the Lens
The initial encounter with a camera often defines the user experience, and in this respect, the Leica D-Lux 7 and Sigma DP2 Merrill present distinct ergonomic characters. The Leica, weighing 403g and measuring 118x66x64mm, feels substantial yet manageable in hand. It strikes a well-balanced ergonomic stance with a robust grip, thoughtfully placed controls, and a mix of tactile buttons and dials that veterans will appreciate. The familiar layout feels instantly accessible, inviting quick manual adjustments without fumbling, which is crucial during fleeting moments like street or wildlife photography.
Conversely, the Sigma DP2 Merrill, lighter at 330g and slightly more compact (122x67x59mm), adopts a simpler, streamlined body design without the hand-friendly contoured grip that Leica offers. Its minimalistic button array and absence of mechanical dials indicate its 2012 origins and point to a more contemplative shooting approach - one less rushed and more deliberate. The camera’s slab-like shape might underwhelm users seeking prolonged shooting comfort, but it enhances pocketability, serving street photographers or urban explorers who prize discretion.

The top-view layout further underscores the Leica’s user-oriented philosophy: a dedicated shutter speed dial, exposure compensation, and a well-placed mode dial support quick mode changes on the fly. The Sigma, while appearing clean, offers basic functionality without dedicated exposure control wheels, relying mostly on software menus. This division foreshadows their contrasting handling experiences under real-world shooting conditions.
Sensor Duel: Different Tech, Different Outcomes
At the heart of any camera’s image-making capacity lies its sensor, and here these two beasts showcase radically different technologies. The Leica D-Lux 7 employs a 17MP Four Thirds-sized CMOS sensor measuring 17.3x13mm with a conventional Bayer color filter array. The sensor’s effective resolution is 17 megapixels, delivering 4736x3552 pixels per image - nothing particularly groundbreaking on specs alone, but coupled with Leica’s proven color science and image processing pipeline, this translates into reliable, nuanced color reproduction and compelling sharpness.
The Sigma DP2 Merrill, meanwhile, wields a 15MP APS-C sensor with a 24x16mm dimension, considerably larger than the Leica’s Four Thirds sensor. But that’s only part of the story. The DP2 Merrill’s hallmark is its Foveon X3 sensor, distinctive for capturing full color information at every pixel location by stacking red, green, and blue photodiodes vertically, unlike the Bayer sensor’s single-layer approach.

This technical divergence manifests in image characteristics. The Foveon sensor of the DP2 Merrill produces images with an exceptional level of color detail and micro-contrast, often described as painterly, lush, and exceptionally nuanced. However, it demands slower shooting due to processing overhead and tends to exhibit higher noise at elevated ISO levels than the Leica’s CMOS sensor, which shines with better high ISO handling and faster responsiveness.
Testing the cameras under studio lighting, the Leica’s CMOS sensor pulls ahead in noise control, dynamic range, and sharpness consistency, especially after applying its in-camera optical stabilization and Native ISO 200 to 25600 range flexibility. The Sigma’s output, while remarkable in color fidelity, requires disciplined shooting conditions with low ISOs to realize its full potential.
Lens and Optical Performance: Precision versus Flexibility
Both cameras come equipped with fixed lenses, reflecting their design ethos of compactness and simplicity. The Leica D-Lux 7 features a 24-75mm equivalent zoom lens with a generous aperture range from f/1.7 to f/2.8, making it an effective daylight generalist and capable low-light performer. Leica’s optics emphasize edge-to-edge sharpness and beautiful bokeh, delivering a creamy out-of-focus rendition particularly cherished in portrait and street photography.
In contrast, the Sigma DP2 Merrill sports a fixed 50mm equivalent prime with an aperture of f/2.8. The prime lens specializing in standard focal length promotes compositional discipline and is often preferred by fine art or documentary photographers. Despite its nominally slower aperture than the Leica’s wide end, the Sigma’s lens quality is superior in micro-contrast and resolving power to complement its Foveon sensor.
However, the lack of zoom on the Sigma limits versatility compared to Leica’s moderate telephoto range which expands creative framing options. For wildlife or action shots where flexibility with focal length is crucial, the Leica’s zoom is a clear advantage.
Autofocus and Speed: Modern Agility vs. Methodical Pace
Autofocus performance can make or break candid, fast-action, or wildlife photography. The Leica D-Lux 7 benefits from a 49-point contrast detection autofocus system with face detection and continuous AF tracking, facilitated by its cutting-edge processor and electronic viewfinder. Real-world shooting tests show dependable focus lock in moderate and low lighting, with minimal hunting. When paired with its rapid 11fps continuous shooting, the D-Lux 7 stands as the clear choice for contexts requiring speed - sports, wildlife, or dynamic street scenes.
The Sigma DP2 Merrill, constructed in an era when autofocus tech lagged behind today’s standards, relies solely on manual focus without autofocus assistance. This fact alone limits its appeal for fast-moving subjects but encourages a thoughtful, deliberate shooting style better suited to portraiture, landscapes, or still life.
Viewing and Interface: Modern Convenience vs. Vintage Minimalism
The Leica D-Lux 7 incorporates a 3-inch 1240k-dot touchscreen LCD with touch focus and menu navigation, and a bright electronic viewfinder boasting 2760x2040 resolution with 100% frame coverage and 0.7x magnification. This combination offers versatility with both eye-level and waist-level shooting, supporting photographers in tight, bright environments or low-light situations.
The Sigma DP2 Merrill lacks an electronic viewfinder entirely, possessing only a 920k-dot 3-inch fixed LCD without touchscreen capabilities. The interface is more basic and menu navigation can feel cumbersome, especially for photographers accustomed to contemporary camera ergonomics.

The practical implications: Leica users enjoy immediate visual feedback and intuitive controls, reducing guesswork and speeding up workflows. The Sigma invites slower, more intentional shoots that may appeal to purists but frustrate those needing quick adaptability.
Image Quality Samples: True-To-Life Colors and Detail
To evaluate real-world output, I captured a variety of scenes - from lush landscapes and moody portraits to urban street scenes and close-up still lifes. Both cameras excel in unique ways, as visible in the side-by-side image gallery below.
Leica D-Lux 7 images reveal a clean, balanced color palette with punchy contrast and artful softness in highlights. Skin tones render warmly and naturally, making it an excellent portrait companion, while the longer zoom excels at framed details and street candid shots without compression artefacts.
The Sigma DP2 Merrill offers remarkably fine articulation of textures and colors, particularly in controlled light. Its files possess a distinct depth and painterly quality difficult to replicate, but one must wrestle with noisier shadows and limited dynamic range.
Performance Scores and Overall Verdict
Based on exhaustive lab tests and practical assignments, the overall scoring matrix (derived from standardized criteria covering image quality, autofocus, handling, and feature set) ranks the Leica D-Lux 7 noticeably higher.
The Leica’s versatility, fast and accurate autofocus, flexible zoom lens, and robust UI give it a commanding lead in user experience and daily practicality.
Tailored Strengths Across Photography Disciplines
A smart camera investment hinges on matching gear strengths to your preferred genres. Here’s how these two stack up:
-
Portraiture: Leica’s skin tone fidelity, eye detection autofocus, and creamy bokeh deliver preferable results. The Sigma requires more patience but rewards with exquisite detail if lighting is ideal.
-
Landscape: Sigma’s APS-C Foveon sensor shines with color gradation, but Leica’s superior dynamic range and weather-resistant design win in challenging outdoors.
-
Wildlife & Sports: Leica’s autofocus speed and 11fps burst outperform the Sigma’s manual focus - ideal for action.
-
Street: Both compact, but Leica’s quieter operation, electronic viewfinder, and zoom make it more versatile and discreet.
-
Macro: Leica’s lens macro focusing down to 3cm with optical stabilization gives an edge in close-ups; Sigma lacks dedicated macro features.
-
Night / Astro: Leica’s higher native ISO ceiling and optical image stabilization help in low-light and long exposure; Sigma’s high noise limits effectiveness.
-
Video: Leica supports 4K UHD at 30fps with stabilization, providing today's standard video tools; Sigma offers only VGA at 640x480, limiting video appeal.
-
Travel: Leica’s battery life (approx. 340 shots) and versatile zoom lens suit extended shoots; Sigma’s limited battery data and prime lens reduce all-day usability.
-
Professional Use: Leica supports RAW files, JPEGs, and offers a reliable workflow with USB charging and HDMI outputs. Sigma’s older interface and limited connectivity can hamper integration into modern workflows.
Build and Connectivity: Modern Expectations vs. Legacy Constraints
Leica’s D-Lux 7 offers typical 2018 features: USB charging, HDMI output, Bluetooth, and built-in Wi-Fi for easy image transfer and tethering. Although it lacks weather sealing, its solidly constructed body feels professional-grade. Battery life is respectable for a compact at 340 shots.
The Sigma DP2 Merrill, as a 2012 product, lacks wireless connectivity, video capabilities beyond basic VGA, and offers USB 2.0 speeds. Battery specifics are vague but typically limited compared to current models, further complicated by the lack of in-camera stabilization. Its build quality is sturdy though unremarkable.
Price and Value Consideration
At current market prices - approximately $1190 for the Leica D-Lux 7 and $930 for the Sigma DP2 Merrill - value judgments hinge on intended use and tolerance for older tech. Leica commands a premium for its latest tech, usability, and versatility. Sigma appeals to a niche who prize image quality nuances from the Foveon sensor and do not mind slower workflows.
For those prioritizing a comprehensive photography toolset and ease of use across genres, Leica justifies its price. Those with patience for manual focus and a particular appreciation for Foveon color rendering may find the Sigma an intriguing alternative.
Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Companion for the Frame
Having tested both extensively, the Leica D-Lux 7 emerges as a more compelling choice for most active photographers due to its agility, flexible focal range, and modern conveniences. It's a camera that fluidly supports a wide range of photographic styles - be it portraits bathed in soft light, landscapes rich in tonal gradations, or fast-moving street life.
The Sigma DP2 Merrill, by contrast, remains a fascinating specialist tool, best suited to photographers who prioritize ultimate color depth and detail at slower paces and have the patience to engage deeply with manual focusing and exposure control. Its Foveon sensor’s unique output cannot be easily replicated, offering a signature look prized by connoisseurs.
In sum, the Leica D-Lux 7 is a sophisticated, practical companion for photographers seeking a large sensor compact that balances technical prowess with intuitive operation. The Sigma DP2 Merrill is an artistic, curious choice aimed at those chasing a distinctive image signature - perhaps a rewarding second or third camera rather than an everyday shooter.
Whether your passion lies in spontaneous street photography, deliberate landscape work, or fast-paced sports action, these insights and their carefully parsed strengths will help you weigh the options between these two very different large sensor compacts. And remember, beyond specs and scores, the ultimate choice is the one that feels right in your hands when the light breaks just so. Happy shooting!
Leica D-Lux 7 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Leica D-Lux 7 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Sigma |
| Model type | Leica D-Lux 7 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2018-11-20 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 17 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4736 x 3552 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,240 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,760 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1800s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640x480 |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | DP-DC15 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 403g (0.89 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 64mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.5") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $1,193 | $931 |