Clicky

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III

Portability
82
Imaging
50
Features
70
Overall
58
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs

Leica D-Lux Typ 109
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
  • 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
  • Released September 2014
  • Alternative Name is Typ 109
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Launched August 2017
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the E-M10 III (16MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The D-Lux Typ 109 was launched 3 years earlier than the E-M10 III and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the D-Lux Typ 109 scores versus the E-M10 III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 D-Lux Typ 109 E-M10 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109

 E-M10 III D-Lux Typ 109 
LaunchedAugust 2017September 2014More recent by 35 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k921kSharper display (+119k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 III

 D-Lux Typ 109 E-M10 III 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 has got outer dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has specifications of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).

Compare the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Olympus E-M10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 and the E-M10 III.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M10 III is 82 and 80 respectively.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M10 III.

To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M10 III to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older D-Lux Typ 109 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica D-Lux Typ 109
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
70
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
73
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Street photography information
Olympus E-M10 III Street photography information
74
has image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
good high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
offers touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
heavier than others in class (410 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Sports photography factors
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography factors
65
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
69
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Travel photography information
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
72
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
reasonably wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f1.7)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
67
offers touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than others in class (410 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography information
73
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f1.7)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging advice
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f1.7)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone jack
32
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
heavier than others in class (410g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 III
 Leica D-Lux Typ 109Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
General Information
Make Leica Olympus
Model type Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Otherwise known as Typ 109 -
Category Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2014-09-23 2017-08-31
Body design Large Sensor Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4112 x 3088 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 49 121
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 24-75mm (3.1x) -
Maximum aperture f/1.7-2.8 -
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Amount of lenses - 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 921k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,760k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.7x 0.62x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shutter speed 11.0fps 8.6fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) 5.80 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 405 grams (0.89 lbs) 410 grams (0.90 lbs)
Dimensions 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images 330 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported)
Storage slots One One
Launch price $1,095 $650