Clicky

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10

Portability
82
Imaging
50
Features
70
Overall
58
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 front
 
Olympus SZ-10 front
Portability
90
Imaging
36
Features
36
Overall
36

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs

Leica D-Lux Typ 109
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
  • 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
  • Launched September 2014
  • Alternative Name is Typ 109
Olympus SZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
  • 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
  • Launched February 2011
Photography Glossary

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview

Let's look closer at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Olympus SZ-10, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is very similar but the D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) and SZ-10 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The D-Lux Typ 109 was brought out 3 years after the SZ-10 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the D-Lux Typ 109 grades versus the SZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Olympus SZ-10

 D-Lux Typ 109 SZ-10 
LaunchedSeptember 2014February 2011More modern by 45 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display resolution921k460kClearer display (+461k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109

 SZ-10 D-Lux Typ 109 

Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus SZ-10

 D-Lux Typ 109 SZ-10 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 comes with outer measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") having a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-10 has sizing of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).

Take a look at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Olympus SZ-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 compared to the SZ-10.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the D-Lux Typ 109 and SZ-10 is 82 and 90 respectively.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The pic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the D-Lux Typ 109 and SZ-10.

As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The D-Lux Typ 109 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SZ-10 will offer you extra detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger D-Lux Typ 109 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Portrait photography information
Olympus SZ-10 Portrait photography information
70
has manual focus
resolution is good (13MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Street photography advice
Olympus SZ-10 Street photography advice
74
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
above average high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (215 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Sports photography advice
Olympus SZ-10 Sports photography advice
65
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (13MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect autofocus
40
excellent zoom range (28-504mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica D-Lux Typ 109
Travel photography with Olympus SZ-10
72
resolution is good (13MP)
quite wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.7)
does not offer selfie friendly display
65
lighter than competition (215 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
great zoom (504mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Landscape photography information
Olympus SZ-10 Landscape photography information
73
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.7)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (13 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
40
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery pack (220 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Vlogging advice
Olympus SZ-10 Vlogging advice
35
quite wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.7)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of external mic socket
31
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than competition (215g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus SZ-10
 Leica D-Lux Typ 109Olympus SZ-10
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Olympus SZ-10
Alternative name Typ 109 -
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-09-23 2011-02-08
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4112 x 3088 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 49 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-75mm (3.1x) 28-504mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.7-2.8 f/3.1-4.4
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 921 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,760 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.7x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 11.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) 7.10 m
Flash settings Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 405 gr (0.89 pounds) 215 gr (0.47 pounds)
Dimensions 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots 220 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at release $1,095 $300