Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is relatively well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 5 years before the E-M1 II which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-M1 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-M1 II
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-M1 II | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | September 2012 | More modern by 48 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-M1 II
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-M1 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1 II is 79 and 68 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1 II.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MOV, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 pounds) | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | 787 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Cost at release | $0 | $1,700 |