Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8079/f8079e7e62404f7aa04408153c07ce853fa40b12" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is relatively well matched but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 5 years before the E-M1 II which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-M1 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-M1 II
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-M1 II | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 48 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-M1 II
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-M1 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24928/24928bdbf2e16899033a8f40662226c3e815944c" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1 II is 79 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b36f2/b36f2a65db294de93529028dadae90bbbea24fc8" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1 II.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2258c/2258c658e44879308bd16c3ad53b2282d888929e" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f391/6f3915f487b6215ccdfe29c130396f52619be0d1" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MOV, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 pounds) | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | 787 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Cost at release | $0 | $1,700 |