Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-M1X, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-M1X (20MP) is pretty close but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M-E Typ 220 was unveiled 7 years prior to the E-M1X and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the M-E Typ 220 grades versus the E-M1X when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The full galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-M1X
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1X |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-M1X | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | September 2012 | More recent by 77 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-M1X
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1X has specifications of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-M1X in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-M1X.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1X is 79 and 54 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1X.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will render extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2019-01-24 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585g (1.29 pounds) | 997g (2.20 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 870 photos |
Type of battery | - | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | - |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Retail pricing | $0 | $2,999 |