Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8079/f8079e7e62404f7aa04408153c07ce853fa40b12" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f4a/39f4a2ac2cd0fd15df5e1339b544117913bf8f2e" alt="Olympus PEN-F front Olympus PEN-F front"
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus PEN-F, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the PEN-F (20MP) is very similar but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and PEN-F (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The M-E Typ 220 was launched 4 years prior to the PEN-F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the M-E Typ 220 scores versus the PEN-F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Olympus PEN-F. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Olympus PEN-F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus PEN-F
M-E Typ 220 | PEN-F |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Leica M-E Typ 220
PEN-F | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 40 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus PEN-F
M-E Typ 220 | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 features outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus PEN-F has specifications of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus PEN-F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the PEN-F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fef20/fef20fc038d44d0bc514cd299bcb2270ca5f3130" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and PEN-F is 79 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9a2e/d9a2e7da0498ad2202565b1837d2a80b15d852c5" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F top view buttons comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F top view buttons comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and PEN-F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a2f1/9a2f116799bee372eed0c8d1dab409fe068ccc1e" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F sensor size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F sensor size comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c4a2/0c4a26c06c665974177412357dad28682412a7af" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN-F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN-F |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2016-01-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585g (1.29 lbs) | 427g (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | 894 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $1,000 |