Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F
79 Imaging
64 Features
28 Overall
49


84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus PEN-F, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the PEN-F (20MP) is very similar but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and PEN-F (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor dimensions.

The M-E Typ 220 was launched 4 years prior to the PEN-F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the M-E Typ 220 scores versus the PEN-F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Olympus PEN-F. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Olympus PEN-F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus PEN-F
M-E Typ 220 | PEN-F |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Leica M-E Typ 220
PEN-F | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 40 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus PEN-F
M-E Typ 220 | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 features outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus PEN-F has specifications of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus PEN-F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the PEN-F.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and PEN-F is 79 and 84 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and PEN-F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus PEN-F Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN-F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN-F |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2016-01-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585g (1.29 lbs) | 427g (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | 894 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $1,000 |