Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Samsung NX300 front
Portability
86
Imaging
63
Features
73
Overall
67

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2012
Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Revealed November 2013
  • Superseded the Samsung NX210
  • Successor is Samsung NX500
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX300, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is pretty similar but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and NX300 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M-E Typ 220 was unveiled 14 months prior to the NX300 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the M-E Typ 220 grades versus the NX300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Samsung NX300

 M-E Typ 220 NX300 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 NX300 M-E Typ 220 
RevealedNovember 2013September 2012More recent by 14 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3.3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.8")
Screen resolution768k230kClearer screen (+538k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX300

 M-E Typ 220 NX300 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

Contrast the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 against the NX300.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and NX300 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and NX300.

Clearly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung NX300 will deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Portrait photography with Samsung NX300
71
has manual focus
decent MP (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
77
manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography highlights
Samsung NX300 Street photography highlights
65
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
80
tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Sports photography with Samsung NX300
46
decent MP (18 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview feature
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
73
high shutter speed (1/6,000s)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
sensor has phase detect AF
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography highlights
Samsung NX300 Travel photography highlights
57
decent MP (18 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
67
boasts focus by touch
megapixel count good (20MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography factors
Samsung NX300 Landscape photography factors
61
has manual focus
change lenses (Leica M mount)
decent MP (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
72
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is good (3.3")
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX300 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
33
touchscreen enabled
supports face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Samsung NX300
 Leica M-E Typ 220Samsung NX300
General Information
Make Leica Samsung
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Samsung NX300
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-09-17 2013-11-24
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - DRIMe IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5212 x 3472 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 2500 25600
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 247
Lens
Lens support Leica M Samsung NX
Total lenses 59 32
Crop factor 1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3.3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 768k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT color LCD Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) None
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/6000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec 9.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 gr (1.29 lb) 331 gr (0.73 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 69 76
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 12.7
DXO Low light rating 787 942
Other
Battery life - 330 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $0 $750