Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2
78 Imaging
64 Features
23 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e48fa/e48faf4407db4014ada716aa50a5807c6a5e2151" alt="Leica M-Monochrom front Leica M-Monochrom front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 10000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Updated by Olympus E-PL3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Leica M-Monochrom versus Olympus E-PL2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the M-Monochrom (18MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the M-Monochrom (Full frame) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The M-Monochrom was unveiled 16 months after the E-PL2 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the M-Monochrom matches up versus the E-PL2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-Monochrom & Olympus PEN E-PL2. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M-Monochrom Gallery & Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-Monochrom over the Olympus E-PL2
M-Monochrom | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Leica M-Monochrom
E-PL2 | M-Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-Monochrom and Olympus E-PL2
M-Monochrom | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica M-Monochrom offers exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL2 has proportions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Examine the Leica M-Monochrom versus Olympus E-PL2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the M-Monochrom against the E-PL2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e6e4/6e6e4ad1ab11c8ee9e60109952d1134fd6257f09" alt="Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M-Monochrom and E-PL2 is 78 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb7d6/fb7d62a275b5ac78cca4fa3a2aa9fc9b92306ce0" alt="Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M-Monochrom and E-PL2.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M-Monochrom using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Leica M-Monochrom will offer more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent M-Monochrom will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4d3e/f4d3e4e86ebbc6f86e3e0340e953a68cefab0d17" alt="Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison"
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c34c/2c34c56ab1ce15cb4eec38a495659b8508f964e7" alt="Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Leica M-Monochrom | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-Monochrom | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-05-10 | 2011-02-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 10000 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD with a sapphire glass LCD cover | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 32 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 362 gr (0.80 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 280 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $7,950 | $0 |