Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
85 Imaging
59 Features
58 Overall
58
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2016
- New Model is Leica TL2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Leica TL, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both built by Leica. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and TL (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and TL (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M Typ 240 was manufactured 5 years prior to the TL which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M Typ 240 grades against the TL with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 and Leica TL. The entire galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Leica TL Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Leica TL
| M Typ 240 | TL |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica TL over the Leica M Typ 240
| TL | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2016 | September 2012 | Newer by 50 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Leica TL
| M Typ 240 | TL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 provides outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Leica TL has measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Leica M Typ 240 versus Leica TL in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the M Typ 240 and the TL.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and TL is 74 and 85 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 240 and TL.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 240 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica TL Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | Leica TL | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Leica |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Leica TL |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2012-09-17 | 2016-11-08 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12500 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Leica L |
| Total lenses | 59 | 4 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, off, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 680 grams (1.50 pounds) | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 400 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP-DC13 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $5,479 | $1,009 |