Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is relatively close but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe M Typ 240 was manufactured 8 years before the E-M1 III which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M Typ 240 scores against the E-M1 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The entire galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-M1 III
M Typ 240 | E-M1 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Leica M Typ 240
E-M1 III | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | September 2012 | More modern by 90 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 III
M Typ 240 | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 240 offers exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 III has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 240 and the E-M1 III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and E-M1 III is 74 and 67 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and E-M1 III.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will render greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2020-02-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic IX |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680 gr (1.50 pounds) | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 420 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | Single | Dual |
Retail cost | $5,479 | $1,800 |