Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Launched September 2012
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is relatively close but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The M Typ 240 was manufactured 8 years before the E-M1 III which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M Typ 240 scores against the E-M1 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 M Typ 240 E-M1 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-M1 III M Typ 240 
RevealedFebruary 2020September 2012More modern by 90 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kCrisper screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 III

 M Typ 240 E-M1 III 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen size

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 240 offers exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 III has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).

Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 240 and the E-M1 III.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and E-M1 III is 74 and 67 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and E-M1 III.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will render greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Portrait photography camera
81
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
77
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Street photography camera
67
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
78
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
provides focus by touch
environment proof
great ISO range (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography highlights
55
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
comes with phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography factors
63
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
79
environment proof
supports bluetooth
provides focus by touch
MP count good (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography features
73
focusing manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
81
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
2 card slots
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging advice
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external mic port
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-M1 III
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Class Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2012-09-17 2020-02-11
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic IX
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 6400 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 121
Cross focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 1,037 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 1% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 60.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1920x1080 4096x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680 gr (1.50 pounds) 580 gr (1.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 1860 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots 420 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)
Card slots Single Dual
Retail cost $5,479 $1,800