Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
74
Imaging
70
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Announced May 2013
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

In this article, we will be matching up the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizing.

YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

The M Typ 240 was manufactured 8 months before the E-PM2 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the M Typ 240 scores vs the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PM2

 M Typ 240 E-PM2 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-PM2 M Typ 240 
AnnouncedMay 2013September 2012More recent by 8 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PM2

 M Typ 240 E-PM2 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 240 has exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Contrast the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the M Typ 240 versus the E-PM2.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PM2 is 74 and 89 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 240 and E-PM2.

Clearly, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will provide extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography factors
82
focusing manually
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
71
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography information
Olympus E-PM2 Street photography information
68
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
fixed screen
no image stabilization
79
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M Typ 240
Sports photography with Olympus E-PM2
56
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
weather proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography information
Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography information
63
weather proof
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
66
has touch focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Landscape photography camera
74
focusing manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
74
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Vlogging details
Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging details
26
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
lack of mic socket
36
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PM2
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-PM2
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-17 2013-05-21
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Peak resolution 5952 x 3976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 1 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680g (1.50 lbs) 269g (0.59 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 84 72
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 12.2
DXO Low light score 1860 932
Other
Battery life 500 photos 360 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $5,479 $448