Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M Typ 240 was manufactured 8 months before the E-PM2 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the M Typ 240 scores vs the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-PM2
| M Typ 240 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M Typ 240
| E-PM2 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2013 | September 2012 | More recent by 8 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-PM2
| M Typ 240 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 240 has exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the M Typ 240 versus the E-PM2.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-PM2 is 74 and 89 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 240 and E-PM2.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will provide extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older M Typ 240 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2013-05-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 84 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light score | 1860 | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 360 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $5,479 | $448 |