Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60


91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus TG-860, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and TG-860 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

The M Typ 240 was brought out 3 years prior to the TG-860 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the M Typ 240 matches up versus the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The entire galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus TG-860
M Typ 240 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Leica M Typ 240
TG-860 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 29 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus TG-860
M Typ 240 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 offers physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 240 versus Olympus TG-860 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the M Typ 240 against the TG-860.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and TG-860 is 74 and 91 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The image below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 240 and TG-860.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 224g (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $5,479 | $279 |