Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and TG-320 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M Typ 240 was announced 9 months after the TG-320 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M Typ 240 grades versus the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus TG-320
M Typ 240 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | January 2012 | More modern by 9 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Leica M Typ 240
TG-320 | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus TG-320
M Typ 240 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 enjoys outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the TG-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and TG-320 is 74 and 94 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The pic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and TG-320.
All in all, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Olympus TG-320 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680 grams (1.50 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 150 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $5,479 | $0 |