Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60


92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh CX4, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Leica and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and CX4 (10MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and CX4 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

The M Typ 240 was unveiled 2 years later than the CX4 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the M Typ 240 grades against the CX4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 240 & Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Ricoh CX4
M Typ 240 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Leica M Typ 240
CX4 | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh CX4
M Typ 240 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 provides outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the CX4.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 240 and CX4 is 74 and 92 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The graphic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and CX4.
Plainly, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will give extra detail having an extra 14MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh CX4 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2010-08-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $5,479 | $211 |