Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Launched September 2010
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M Typ 240 was released 2 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the M Typ 240 scores against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
M Typ 240 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Leica M Typ 240
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
M Typ 240 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 comes with exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the M Typ 240 and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 74 and 88 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680 grams (1.50 lb) | 140 grams (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 320 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $5,479 | $566 |