Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Launched August 2010
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M Typ 240 was brought out 2 years after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the M Typ 240 scores versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M Typ 240 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | August 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Leica M Typ 240
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M Typ 240 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 offers outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 74 and 85 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer more detail having its extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 240 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680 gr (1.50 lbs) | 367 gr (0.81 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 440 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $5,479 | $147 |