Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Launched November 2015
  • Alternate Name is Typ 262
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-P3
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The M Typ 262 was revealed 5 years later than the E-P2 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the M Typ 262 grades against the E-P2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-P2

 M Typ 262 E-P2 
LaunchedNovember 2015April 2010More recent by 68 months
Display resolution921k230kCrisper display (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Leica M Typ 262

 E-P2 M Typ 262 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P2

 M Typ 262 E-P2 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 comes with outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has sizing of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the E-P2.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and E-P2 is 77 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-P2.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will give more detail because of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 262 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography information
75
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
60
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M Typ 262
Street photography with Olympus E-P2
66
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Sports photography factors
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography factors
50
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
low battery pack (300 shots)
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
58
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
43
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low battery pack (300 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M Typ 262
Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
69
has manual focus
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is good (3")
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
60
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (300 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Vlogging info
Olympus E-P2 Vlogging info
22
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution ( pxls)
no microphone jack
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-P2
 Leica M Typ 262Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 262 Olympus PEN E-P2
Also called as Typ 262 -
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2015-11-19 2010-04-22
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Maestro TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 855.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 921 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution - 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 600 grams (1.32 lbs) 355 grams (0.78 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 56
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 505
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model BP-SCL2 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Card slots One One
Price at release $5,069 $799