Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Released November 2015
  • Additionally referred to as Typ 262
Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Announced November 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M Typ 262 was manufactured 5 years later than the E-PL1s and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the M Typ 262 matches up against the E-PL1s when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL1s

 M Typ 262 E-PL1s 
AnnouncedNovember 2015November 2010More recent by 61 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Leica M Typ 262

 E-PL1s M Typ 262 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL1s

 M Typ 262 E-PL1s 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL1s has sizing of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

See the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the E-PL1s.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PL1s is 77 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and E-PL1s.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will result in greater detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 262 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Portrait photography info
Olympus E-PL1s Portrait photography info
75
you can focus manually
decent MP (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
60
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Street photography camera
66
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Sports photography details
Olympus E-PL1s Sports photography details
50
decent MP (24 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12MP)
not so great battery power (290 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M Typ 262
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL1s
58
decent MP (24MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
51
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (290 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-PL1s Landscape photography advice
69
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
decent MP (24MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
55
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (12MP)
not so great battery power (290 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-PL1s Vlogging highlights
22
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video ( resolution)
lack of microphone port
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focus
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL1s
 Leica M Typ 262Olympus PEN E-PL1s
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 262 Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Also Known as Typ 262 -
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2015-11-19 2010-11-16
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Maestro Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 855.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 921 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution - 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 600 grams (1.32 lbs) 334 grams (0.74 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 290 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP-SCL2 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $5,069 $599