Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Additionally referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL2
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M Typ 262 was manufactured 5 years later than the E-PL1s and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the M Typ 262 matches up against the E-PL1s when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus PEN E-PL1s. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-PL1s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL1s
M Typ 262 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2015 | November 2010 | More recent by 61 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Leica M Typ 262
E-PL1s | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL1s
M Typ 262 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL1s has sizing of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
See the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the E-PL1s.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PL1s is 77 and 86 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and E-PL1s.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will result in greater detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 262 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL1s |
Also Known as | Typ 262 | - |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-11-19 | 2010-11-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 334 grams (0.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $5,069 | $599 |