Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony T900, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was announced 5 years after the T900 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-M1 scores against the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony T900
| WG-M1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| T900 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+2") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony T900
| WG-M1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got external measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and T900.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to resolve extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $300 |