Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL5 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL5 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 262 was introduced 3 years after the E-PL5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M Typ 262 matches up versus the E-PL5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus PEN E-PL5. The whole galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-PL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL5
| M Typ 262 | E-PL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2015 |  | September 2012 | More modern by 39 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Leica M Typ 262
| E-PL5 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL5
| M Typ 262 | E-PL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 262 provides outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL5 has dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the E-PL5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and E-PL5 is 77 and 88 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and E-PL5.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will produce more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL5 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PL5 |
| Also referred to as | Typ 262 | - |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2015-11-19 | 2012-09-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Maestro | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 pounds) | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 889 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $5,069 | $400 |