Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Alternate Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M Typ 262 was introduced 3 years after the TG-820 iHS which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the M Typ 262 scores versus the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
M Typ 262 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | February 2012 | More modern by 46 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Leica M Typ 262
TG-820 iHS | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 921k | Sharper display (+109k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
M Typ 262 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 has external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 262 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the M Typ 262 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and TG-820 iHS is 77 and 92 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The pic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will give you greater detail using its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer M Typ 262 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Also called as | Typ 262 | - |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Maestro | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $5,069 | $500 |