Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e12/b8e123edbad624b77bc200569372c45fa64c0b47" alt="Leica M Typ 262 front Leica M Typ 262 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a7c2/5a7c200f7198b7d871a7cc0f294d85a2774e776e" alt="Samsung NX1100 front Samsung NX1100 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX1000
- Refreshed by Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Leica M Typ 262 and Samsung NX1100, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Samsung. The resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the NX1100 (20MP) is very similar but the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and NX1100 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The M Typ 262 was unveiled 2 years later than the NX1100 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M Typ 262 grades against the NX1100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 & Samsung NX1100. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Samsung NX1100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Samsung NX1100
M Typ 262 | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2015 | ![]() | April 2013 | More recent by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1100 over the Leica M Typ 262
NX1100 | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Samsung NX1100
M Typ 262 | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 921k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Samsung NX1100 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M Typ 262 and Samsung NX1100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 262 against the NX1100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c576/4c57631a2f665905aaa1a8d29cc80970e8892d6a" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and NX1100 is 77 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61162/61162fa28945641558077a9dc03e91aef588b266" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and NX1100.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will offer greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 262 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c109d/c109da79d8d16b319761c7bb459a8111c4e08994" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison"
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b7f9/8b7f98ad1523cf4e6d68759c995b7cc74df04b4e" alt="Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Samsung NX1100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Samsung |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Samsung NX1100 |
Also called | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-11-19 | 2013-04-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Maestro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Samsung NX |
Available lenses | 59 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 852 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $5,069 | $600 |