Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
76 Imaging
83 Features
56 Overall
72


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 64 - 50000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 640g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
- Launched January 2022
- Earlier Model is Leica M10
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M11 (60MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the M11 (Full frame) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.

The M11 was manufactured 12 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M11 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M11 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M11 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M11 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
M11 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2022 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 149 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 2333k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1413k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Leica M11
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | M11 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M11 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
M11 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M11 has got exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the M11 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M11 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 76 and 77 respectively.

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M11 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M11 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Leica M11 will produce more detail due to its extra 48 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger M11 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Leica M11 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M11 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-01-13 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 60 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 9528 x 6328 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 50000 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 62 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,333 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 3600 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.5 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 640 grams (1.41 lb) | 453 grams (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 700 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BC-SCL7 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12s) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | UHS II type SD | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $8,995 | $566 |