Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
76 Imaging
82 Features
56 Overall
71


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 64 - 50000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 640g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
- Released January 2022
- Superseded the Leica M10
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Let's look more closely at the Leica M11 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the M11 (60MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the M11 (Full frame) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

The M11 was manufactured 11 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M11 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M11 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M11 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M11 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M11 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2022 | ![]() | March 2010 | More modern by 144 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 2333k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1413k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Leica M11
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | M11 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M11 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M11 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica M11 comes with physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M11 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the M11 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M11 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 76 and 85 respectively.

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M11 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M11 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica M11 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 50MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer M11 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M11 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Leica M11 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M11 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-01-13 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 60 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 9528 x 6328 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 50000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 62 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.00" | 3" |
Display resolution | 2,333 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 3600 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.5 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 640 grams (1.41 lb) | 355 grams (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 700 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BC-SCL7 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12s) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | UHS II type SD | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $8,995 | $349 |