Clicky

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1

Portability
79
Imaging
63
Features
30
Overall
49
Leica M9 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs

Leica M9
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2009
  • Replacement is Leica M9-P
Olympus E-P1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • New Model is Olympus E-P2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview

Here is a thorough review of the Leica M9 and Olympus E-P1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the M9 (18MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the M9 (Full frame) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M9 was brought out 2 months later than the E-P1 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the M9 grades against the E-P1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Olympus E-P1

 M9 E-P1 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Leica M9

 E-P1 M9 
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Leica M9 and Olympus E-P1

 M9 E-P1 
RevealedSeptember 2009July 2009Same age
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica M9 enjoys outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P1 has dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Look at the Leica M9 and Olympus E-P1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the M9 against the E-P1.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M9 and E-P1 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M9 and E-P1.

To sum up, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M9 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Leica M9 will render greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 sensor size comparison

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M9 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-P1 Portrait photography details
69
focusing manually
good megapixels (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Leica M9 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-P1 as a Street photography camera
65
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Leica M9 Sports photography features
Olympus E-P1 Sports photography features
44
good megapixels (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery (350 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (300 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Leica M9 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P1 as a Travel photography camera
54
good megapixels (18MP)
lack of Time Lapse mode
not so great battery (350 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
43
no Timelapse recording
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Leica M9 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-P1 Landscape photography information
60
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
saves RAW files
small screen (2.5")
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery (350 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
60
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
not so great battery (300 per charge)
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M9
Vlogging with Olympus E-P1
9
no video recording
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M9 and Olympus E-P1
 Leica M9Olympus PEN E-P1
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M9 Olympus PEN E-P1
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2009-09-09 2009-07-29
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 2500 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) None
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 gr (1.29 lbs) 355 gr (0.78 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 69 55
DXO Color Depth rating 22.5 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 10.4
DXO Low light rating 884 536
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 300 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC card
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $2,750 $182