Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-860 was unveiled 2 years later than the XZ-10 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-860 matches up against the XZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus XZ-10
TG-860 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 25 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus TG-860
XZ-10 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus XZ-10
TG-860 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-860 enjoys outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-860 vs the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9eba/a9ebae1ce54be0a0e5794796f60c450be2acb1fb" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-860 and XZ-10 is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd82b/fd82b7b0cb32d301b1ee35c06fff5a1d0ea39b68" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and XZ-10.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-860 to render greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer TG-860 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbd0e/bbd0e4dc4776b5439eba012542e6fe602293d418" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e7ac/9e7ac6a2b21cf647469de6e70c8a0ae3d7e8efc0" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $279 | $428 |