Clicky

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
79
Imaging
63
Features
30
Overall
49
Leica M9 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Leica M9
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Launched September 2009
  • Replacement is Leica M9-P
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced April 2010
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

The following is a complete assessment of the Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the M9 (18MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the M9 (Full frame) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) have different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M9 was revealed 7 months before the E-P2 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the M9 matches up vs the E-P2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Olympus E-P2

 M9 E-P2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Leica M9

 E-P2 M9 
IntroducedApril 2010September 2009Newer by 7 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Leica M9 and Olympus E-P2

 M9 E-P2 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Leica M9 enjoys exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has sizing of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Compare the Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the M9 vs the E-P2.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M9 and E-P2 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The picture below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M9 and E-P2.

To sum up, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M9 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M9 will render extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged M9 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M9 Portrait photography features
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography features
69
focusing manually
decent MP (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M9
Street photography with Olympus E-P2
65
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Leica M9 Sports photography information
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography information
44
decent MP (18 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
terrible battery pack (300 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Leica M9 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-P2 Travel photography highlights
54
decent MP (18MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (350 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
43
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Leica M9 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography features
60
focusing manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
decent MP (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
does not have anti aliasing filter
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery life (350 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
60
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (300 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M9 Vlogging details
Olympus E-P2 Vlogging details
9
can't record video
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M9 and Olympus E-P2
 Leica M9Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M9 Olympus PEN E-P2
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2009-09-09 2010-04-22
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Peak resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 2500 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 gr (1.29 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 69 56
DXO Color Depth rating 22.5 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 10.4
DXO Low light rating 884 505
Other
Battery life 350 photos 300 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC card
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $2,750 $799