Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2
79 Imaging
62 Features
30 Overall
49


89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2009
- Updated by Leica M9-P
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M9 (18MP) and the E-PM2 (16MP) is fairly similar but the M9 (Full frame) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizing.

The M9 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the E-PM2 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M9 grades versus the E-PM2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M9 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are available at Leica M9 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Olympus E-PM2
M9 | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M9
E-PM2 | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | ![]() | September 2009 | More modern by 45 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M9 and Olympus E-PM2
M9 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Leica M9 offers physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the M9 versus the E-PM2.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M9 and E-PM2 is 79 and 89 respectively.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M9 and E-PM2.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M9 with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Leica M9 will offer you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged M9 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Leica M9 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M9 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-09-09 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 360 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $2,750 | $448 |