Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F
79 Imaging
63 Features
30 Overall
49
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2009
- Refreshed by Leica M9-P
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Launched January 2012
Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Leica M9 versus Samsung WB850F, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Leica and Samsung. The resolution of the M9 (18MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is fairly well matched but the M9 (Full frame) and WB850F (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe M9 was launched 3 years earlier than the WB850F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Leica M9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the M9 matches up versus the WB850F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M9 & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M9 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Samsung WB850F
M9 | WB850F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Leica M9
WB850F | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | September 2009 | More modern by 28 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M9 and Samsung WB850F
M9 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Leica M9 provides physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M9 versus Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the M9 compared to the WB850F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M9 and WB850F is 79 and 91 respectively.
Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The pic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M9 and WB850F.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M9 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M9 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M9 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M9 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Leica M9 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Samsung |
Model | Leica M9 | Samsung WB850F |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-09-09 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $2,750 | $599 |