Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300
60 Imaging
81 Features
66 Overall
75
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Introduced October 2020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A330
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Leica Q2 Monochrom versus Sony A300, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Leica and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) and A300 (10MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) and A300 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Q2 Monochrom was introduced 12 years later than the A300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Q2 Monochrom matches up against the A300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica Q2 Monochrom and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Sony A300
Q2 Monochrom | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2020 | January 2008 | More recent by 155 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
A300 | Q2 Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Sony A300
Q2 Monochrom | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Leica Q2 Monochrom features physical dimensions of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") and a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
See the Leica Q2 Monochrom versus Sony A300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Q2 Monochrom versus the A300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Q2 Monochrom and A300 is 60 and 64 respectively.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The photograph below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Q2 Monochrom and A300.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Q2 Monochrom with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Leica Q2 Monochrom will offer you greater detail using its extra 37 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher Q2 Monochrom is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sony A300 Specifications
Leica Q2 Monochrom | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Sony |
Model type | Leica Q2 Monochrom | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2020-10-11 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 100000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 734 grams (1.62 lbs) | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $5,995 | $0 |