Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010
61 Imaging
80 Features
70 Overall
76
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Leica Q2 versus Olympus 8010, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the Q2 (47MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the Q2 (Full frame) and 8010 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Q2 was announced 9 years later than the 8010 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica Q2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the Q2 matches up versus the 8010 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica Q2 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The whole galleries are provided at Leica Q2 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 over the Olympus 8010
| Q2 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2019 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 111 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Leica Q2
| 8010 | Q2 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica Q2 and Olympus 8010
| Q2 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica Q2 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") and a weight of 718 grams (1.58 lbs) while the Olympus 8010 has sizing of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica Q2 versus Olympus 8010 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Q2 compared to the 8010.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Q2 and 8010 is 61 and 92 respectively.
Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Q2 and 8010.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Q2 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Leica Q2 will give you more detail with its extra 34 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher Q2 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Leica Q2 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Leica Q2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica Q2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also called | Type No. 4889 | mju Tough 8010 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2019-03-07 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 47 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 50000 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 17cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4K/30/24p, 1080/120/60/30/24p | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 718 grams (1.58 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 96 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 2491 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 370 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $4,985 | $600 |
