Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s
60 Imaging
84 Features
77 Overall
81
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 100000
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 8192 x 4320 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 743g - 130 x 80 x 93mm
- Launched May 2023
- Replaced the Leica Q2
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Released February 2010
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2
- Replacement is Sigma DP2x
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Leica and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the Q3 (60MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the Q3 (Full frame) and DP2s (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Q3 was announced 13 years later than the DP2s and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Q3 scores versus the DP2s in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica Q3 & Sigma DP2s. The whole galleries are available at Leica Q3 Gallery & Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q3 over the Sigma DP2s
| Q3 | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2023 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 162 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3.00" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1843k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1613k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Leica Q3
| DP2s | Q3 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica Q3 and Sigma DP2s
| Q3 | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Leica Q3 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 80mm x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 743 grams (1.64 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2s has sizing of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Q3 compared to the DP2s.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Q3 and DP2s is 60 and 86 respectively.
Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The photograph here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Q3 and DP2s.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Q3 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica Q3 will produce greater detail with its extra 55MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Q3 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Leica Q3 vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
| Leica Q3 | Sigma DP2s | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Sigma |
| Model type | Leica Q3 | Sigma DP2s |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2023-05-25 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | True II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 60MP | 5MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 9520 x 6336 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Maximum native ISO | 100000 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 315 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 17cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.00 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,843 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.79x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 120 secs | 15 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 15.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/500 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | C8K/8K at 30p/25/24p, C4K/4K at 60/50/30/24p, 1080p at 120/100/60/50/30/24p | 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 8192x4320 | 320x240 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 743 gr (1.64 lb) | 280 gr (0.62 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 80 x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL6 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $5,999 | $940 |