Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2
85 Imaging
59 Features
58 Overall
58
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Announced November 2016
- Successor is Leica TL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P3
Photography Glossary Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the TL (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the TL (APS-C) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TL was announced 6 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TL grades vs the E-P2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica TL & Olympus PEN E-P2. The whole galleries are provided at Leica TL Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica TL over the Olympus E-P2
| TL | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2016 | April 2010 | Fresher by 80 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Leica TL
| E-P2 | TL |
|---|
Common features in the Leica TL and Olympus E-P2
| TL | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica TL enjoys outer dimensions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TL vs the E-P2.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TL and E-P2 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TL and E-P2.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TL having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Leica TL will result in extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher TL should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Leica TL vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
| Leica TL | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica TL | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2016-11-08 | 2010-04-22 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12500 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, off, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 355g (0.78 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-DC13 | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $1,009 | $799 |