Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2
85 Imaging
67 Features
64 Overall
65
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 50000
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 399g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Released July 2017
- Succeeded the Leica TL
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Leica TL2 and Olympus E-PM2, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the TL2 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the TL2 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TL2 was unveiled 4 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TL2 scores against the E-PM2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica TL2 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are available at Leica TL2 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica TL2 over the Olympus E-PM2
| TL2 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2017 | May 2013 | Fresher by 51 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica TL2
| E-PM2 | TL2 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica TL2 and Olympus E-PM2
| TL2 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Leica TL2 has got physical dimensions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Leica TL2 and Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TL2 versus the E-PM2.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TL2 and E-PM2 is 85 and 89 respectively.
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TL2 and E-PM2.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TL2 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica TL2 will offer greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher TL2 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Leica TL2 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica TL2 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2017-07-10 | 2013-05-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 6016 x 4014 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 50000 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 4 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/40000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 399g (0.88 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | 360 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-DC13 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $2,195 | $448 |